<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkedIn Company News Feature &#8212; First Impression</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.meydad.com/2008/02/25/linkedin-company-news-feature-first-impression/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.meydad.com/2008/02/25/linkedin-company-news-feature-first-impression/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on social applications, usability, search, mobile, music and sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Viney</title>
		<link>http://www.meydad.com/2008/02/25/linkedin-company-news-feature-first-impression/comment-page-1/#comment-11035</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Viney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meydad.com/2008/02/25/linkedin-company-news-feature-first-impression/#comment-11035</guid>
		<description>The design and user experience seem to be on point, and at the very least they&#039;re looking a little more contemporary. They seem to be making some good progress making network activity a priority as a way to increase interaction between users. The one complaint I have so far is with the main navigation. Visually the turquoise horizontal line feels like an old-school frame. It&#039;s distracting. Also, the downplay of the navigation Flickr-style buries some of the features with the result being that the site feels very narrow. This might be a good thing if they feel that the primary interactions are going to come from areas within the body content, but I wonder what it will be like for new members or people with very few connections in their network. The folks who can potentially benefit the most from a site like Linkedin are the ones just starting out on their career path. I also feel like search has lost it&#039;s prominence, but I&#039;m going to have to sign back in to verify my first impression.

I went back to verify my statement about search and got their maintenance page. Either they deployed and have some quick bug fixes coming at the last minute on a Friday or they&#039;re adding some more features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The design and user experience seem to be on point, and at the very least they&#8217;re looking a little more contemporary. They seem to be making some good progress making network activity a priority as a way to increase interaction between users. The one complaint I have so far is with the main navigation. Visually the turquoise horizontal line feels like an old-school frame. It&#8217;s distracting. Also, the downplay of the navigation Flickr-style buries some of the features with the result being that the site feels very narrow. This might be a good thing if they feel that the primary interactions are going to come from areas within the body content, but I wonder what it will be like for new members or people with very few connections in their network. The folks who can potentially benefit the most from a site like Linkedin are the ones just starting out on their career path. I also feel like search has lost it&#8217;s prominence, but I&#8217;m going to have to sign back in to verify my first impression.</p>
<p>I went back to verify my statement about search and got their maintenance page. Either they deployed and have some quick bug fixes coming at the last minute on a Friday or they&#8217;re adding some more features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

